<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><!-- generator=Zoho Sites --><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><atom:link href="https://www.claimattorney.com/blogs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><title>The Claim Attorney - Blog</title><description>The Claim Attorney - Blog</description><link>https://www.claimattorney.com/blogs</link><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 05:24:03 -0700</lastBuildDate><generator>http://zoho.com/sites/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[When "fore" may equal 1]]></title><link>https://www.claimattorney.com/blogs/post/when-fore-may-equal-1</link><description><![CDATA[<img align="left" hspace="5" src="https://www.claimattorney.com/ChatGPT Image Nov 15- 2025- 04_19_55 PM.png"/>Need Help With a Texas Homeowners Claim? If you’re dealing with repeated golf-ball damage—or any roof or property claim, my office can help you unders ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zpcontent-container blogpost-container "><div data-element-id="elm_rrMn8PIdQkSRd-5aRAbMtg" data-element-type="section" class="zpsection "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpcontainer-fluid zpcontainer"><div data-element-id="elm_27w_vw3PSOmEFvMzbgTf7w" data-element-type="row" class="zprow zprow-container zpalign-items- zpjustify-content- " data-equal-column=""><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_uv5ACSI2R_mBZu3rXgxWeA" data-element-type="column" class="zpelem-col zpcol-12 zpcol-md-12 zpcol-sm-12 zpalign-self- "><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_-eb1PI4c8WJz29jhFogapA" data-element-type="iconHeadingText" class="zpelement zpelem-iconheadingtext "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpicon-container zpicon-align-center zpicon-align-mobile-center zpicon-align-tablet-center "><style></style><span class="zpicon zpicon-common zpicon-anchor zpicon-size-md zpicon-style-none " style="height:51px;width:51px;"><svg width="896" height="896" viewBox="0 0 1792 1792" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M1472 992v480q0 26-19 45t-45 19h-384v-384h-256v384h-384q-26 0-45-19t-19-45v-480q0-1 .5-3t.5-3l575-474 575 474q1 2 1 6zm223-69l-62 74q-8 9-21 11h-3q-13 0-21-7l-692-577-692 577q-12 8-24 7-13-2-21-11l-62-74q-8-10-7-23.5t11-21.5l719-599q32-26 76-26t76 26l244 204v-195q0-14 9-23t23-9h192q14 0 23 9t9 23v408l219 182q10 8 11 21.5t-7 23.5z"/></svg></span><h4 class="zpicon-heading " data-editor="true"><span style="font-size:24px;"><strong>Introduction</strong></span></h4><div class="zpicon-text-container " data-editor="true"><p></p><div style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">If you live next to a Texas golf course, you may be all too familiar with the sound of golf balls striking your roof. Over a season, or over many years, these repeated impacts can cause fractured shingles, cracked tiles, punctured underlayment, or long-term water intrusion.</span></div>
<p></p><div style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><div style="display:inline;"><div><span style="font-size:20px;">But here is the question most homeowners struggle with:</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:20px;">Does each golf-ball strike count as a separate insurance claim and separate deductible?Or can all the damage be treated as one “occurrence” under your Texas homeowners policy?</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:20px;">Texas law and standard Texas HO-3 homeowners policies provide a strong argument that repeated golf-ball strikes from the same source are one occurrence—meaning one deductible, not dozens.</span><span style="font-size:20px;">Below is a comprehensive explanation of the governing law, policy language, and strategic guidance for homeowners dealing with this issue.</span></div>
</div><p></p></div></div></div></div><div data-element-id="elm_XlqZOnhXh_F06F63hBtliA" data-element-type="iconHeadingText" class="zpelement zpelem-iconheadingtext "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpicon-container zpicon-align-center zpicon-align-mobile-center zpicon-align-tablet-center "><style></style><span class="zpicon zpicon-common zpicon-anchor zpicon-size-md zpicon-style-none "><svg width="896" height="896" viewBox="0 0 1792 1792" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M1472 992v480q0 26-19 45t-45 19h-384v-384h-256v384h-384q-26 0-45-19t-19-45v-480q0-1 .5-3t.5-3l575-474 575 474q1 2 1 6zm223-69l-62 74q-8 9-21 11h-3q-13 0-21-7l-692-577-692 577q-12 8-24 7-13-2-21-11l-62-74q-8-10-7-23.5t11-21.5l719-599q32-26 76-26t76 26l244 204v-195q0-14 9-23t23-9h192q14 0 23 9t9 23v408l219 182q10 8 11 21.5t-7 23.5z"/></svg></span><h4 class="zpicon-heading " data-editor="true"><span style="font-size:24px;"><strong>1. The Policy Language: “Occurrence” and the Section I Deductible</strong></span></h4><div class="zpicon-text-container " data-editor="true"><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Most Texas HO-3 homeowners policies define an <strong>occurrence</strong> as:</span></p><p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></p><div><span style="font-size:20px;"><span></span><blockquote><span></span><p></p><div style="text-align:justify;"><div><strong><span>“an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful conditions.”&nbsp;</span></strong><em><span style="font-size:20px;">—Texas HO-3 Form, USAA.HO-3RTX.07.08, Definition of Occurrence.</span></em></div>
</div><p></p><span></span></blockquote><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>This definition <em>explicitly</em> groups together:</span></p><span></span><ul><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>continuous exposure</span></p><span></span></li><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>repeated exposure</span></p><span></span></li><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>substantially the same harmful conditions</span></p><span></span></li><span></span></ul><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Golf balls repeatedly leaving the same tee box or fairway and impacting the same roof slope <em>are</em> “repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful conditions.”</span></p><span></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span>The Deductible Is Applied Per Loss (Per Occurrence)</span></strong></h3><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Texas HO-3 forms also state:</span></p><span></span><blockquote><span></span><p></p><div style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span>“We will pay only that part of the total of all loss payable under Section I that exceeds the deductible amount shown in the Declarations.”&nbsp;</span></strong>—Texas HO-3 Form, Section I – Conditions, Deductible clause. </div>
<p></p><span></span></blockquote><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>This language means:</span></p><span></span><ul><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>the deductible applies <strong>once per covered loss</strong>, not per incident</span></p><span></span></li><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>insurers must first determine whether the roof damage is one loss or multiple losses</span></p><span></span></li><span></span></ul><span></span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:16px;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Nothing in the policy requires the deductible to reset for each roof impact. To the contrary, the policy’s own aggregation clause (“continuous or repeated exposure”) is designed to <em>combine</em> these impacts into a single occurrence.</span><br></span></p></div>
</div></div></div><div data-element-id="elm_YAp0a5f-vDnj6IOeAHYWSw" data-element-type="iconHeadingText" class="zpelement zpelem-iconheadingtext "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpicon-container zpicon-align-center zpicon-align-mobile-center zpicon-align-tablet-center "><style></style><span class="zpicon zpicon-common zpicon-anchor zpicon-size-md zpicon-style-none "><svg width="896" height="896" viewBox="0 0 1792 1792" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M1472 992v480q0 26-19 45t-45 19h-384v-384h-256v384h-384q-26 0-45-19t-19-45v-480q0-1 .5-3t.5-3l575-474 575 474q1 2 1 6zm223-69l-62 74q-8 9-21 11h-3q-13 0-21-7l-692-577-692 577q-12 8-24 7-13-2-21-11l-62-74q-8-10-7-23.5t11-21.5l719-599q32-26 76-26t76 26l244 204v-195q0-14 9-23t23-9h192q14 0 23 9t9 23v408l219 182q10 8 11 21.5t-7 23.5z"/></svg></span><h4 class="zpicon-heading " data-editor="true"><div style="display:inline;"><span style="font-size:24px;"><strong>2. Texas Uses the “Cause Test” to Count Occurrences</strong></span></div></h4><div class="zpicon-text-container " data-editor="true"><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Texas courts consistently apply the <strong>cause test</strong> (also called the causation rule):</span></p><p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></p><div><span style="font-size:20px;"><span></span><blockquote><span></span><div><span><span></span><blockquote><span></span><div><span><span></span><blockquote><span></span><div><span><span></span><blockquote><span></span><div><span><span></span><blockquote><span></span><div><span><span></span><blockquote><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span>The number of occurrences is determined by the number of causes of the injury, not the number of injurious effects.</span></strong></p><span></span></blockquote><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Here are the leading cases:</span></p><span></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong style="font-style:italic;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><span>Maurice Pincoffs Co. v. St. Paul Fire &amp; Marine Ins. Co.</span>&nbsp;</span></strong><span style="color:rgb(78, 83, 85);font-size:20px;">447 F.2d 204, 206–07 (5th Cir. 1971)</span></h3><span></span><ul><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>The seminal Texas case adopting the cause test.</span></p><span></span></li><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Courts look to the underlying cause, not the number of injuries.</span></p><span></span></li><span></span></ul><span></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong style="font-style:italic;"><span style="font-size:20px;">H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co.&nbsp;</span></strong><span style="color:rgb(78, 83, 85);font-size:20px;">150 F.3d 526, 531–32 (5th Cir. 1998)</span></h3><span></span><ul><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Reaffirmed Texas’s cause test.</span></p><span></span></li><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Multiple assaults were multiple occurrences because each assault was a<strong></strong><strong>separate immediate cause</strong>.</span></p><span></span></li><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Negligent supervision was <em>not</em> the cause; the assaults were.</span></p><span></span></li><span></span></ul><span></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong style="font-style:italic;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Foust v. Ranger Ins. Co.&nbsp;</span></strong><span style="color:rgb(78, 83, 85);font-size:20px;">975 S.W.2d 329, 332–33 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, pet. denied)</span></h3><span></span><ul><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Herbicide overspray over a large area was one occurrence because there was a single spraying operation—a single continuous cause.</span></p><span></span></li><span><strong></strong></span></ul><span></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong style="font-style:italic;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Lafarge Corp. v. Hartford Cas. Co.&nbsp;</span></strong><span style="color:rgb(78, 83, 85);font-size:20px;">61 F.3d 389, 395–97 (5th Cir. 1995)</span></h3><span></span><ul><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>A continuous emission causing widespread dust damage was one occurrence.</span></p><span></span></li><span></span></ul><span></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong style="font-style:italic;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Matador Petroleum Corp. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co.&nbsp;</span></strong><span style="color:rgb(78, 83, 85);font-size:20px;">174 F.3d 653, 657–58 (5th Cir. 1999)</span></h3><span></span><ul><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>A continuous release of oil and gas was treated as<strong></strong>one occurrence.</span></p><span></span></li><span></span></ul><span></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span>Key Takeaway Under Texas Law</span></strong></h3><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>If <strong>one continuous hazard</strong> produces multiple injuries, Texas courts treat the entire series as one occurrence.&nbsp;</span>Repeated golf-ball impacts from the same hole, creating the same hazard, causing damage to the same roof are, functionally, one continuing cause.</p></span></div>
</blockquote></span></div></blockquote></span></div></blockquote></span></div></blockquote></span></div>
</blockquote></span></div></div></div></div><div data-element-id="elm_2O8DjhOzhfDmrR9yNHcR0w" data-element-type="iconHeadingText" class="zpelement zpelem-iconheadingtext "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpicon-container zpicon-align-center zpicon-align-mobile-center zpicon-align-tablet-center "><style></style><span class="zpicon zpicon-common zpicon-anchor zpicon-size-md zpicon-style-none "><svg width="896" height="896" viewBox="0 0 1792 1792" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M1472 992v480q0 26-19 45t-45 19h-384v-384h-256v384h-384q-26 0-45-19t-19-45v-480q0-1 .5-3t.5-3l575-474 575 474q1 2 1 6zm223-69l-62 74q-8 9-21 11h-3q-13 0-21-7l-692-577-692 577q-12 8-24 7-13-2-21-11l-62-74q-8-10-7-23.5t11-21.5l719-599q32-26 76-26t76 26l244 204v-195q0-14 9-23t23-9h192q14 0 23 9t9 23v408l219 182q10 8 11 21.5t-7 23.5z"/></svg></span><h4 class="zpicon-heading " data-editor="true"><strong><span style="font-size:24px;">3. Cases Supporting “Continuous or Repeated Exposure” as One Occurrence</span></strong></h4><div class="zpicon-text-container " data-editor="true"><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Several Texas courts recognize that an occurrence includes <em>ongoing harmful conditions</em> and <em>repeated exposures</em>.</span></p><div><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;font-style:italic;">Dorchester Dev. Corp. v. Safeco Ins. Co.&nbsp;</span></strong><span style="font-size:20px;color:rgb(78, 83, 85);">737 S.W.2d 380, 383 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1987, no writ)</span></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">“Occurrence” includes continuous or repeated exposure to conditions.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Ongoing water intrusion fit the definition.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;font-style:italic;">Pilgrim Enters., Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.&nbsp;</span></strong><span style="font-size:20px;color:rgb(78, 83, 85);">24 S.W.3d 488, 501 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.)</span></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Applied the same “continuous or repeated exposure” language.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Reinforced that repeated exposure may be aggregated into one occurrence.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;font-style:italic;">Lennar Corp. v. Great Am. Ins. Co.&nbsp;</span></strong><span style="font-size:20px;color:rgb(78, 83, 85);">200 S.W.3d 651, 673–76 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, pet. denied)</span></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Recognized that ongoing construction-defect damages occur over time but may fall under one occurrence if caused by a single continuous condition.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Analogy to Golf-Ball Strikes</span></strong></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p></p><div style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Ongoing water intrusion = ongoing golf-ball intrusion.</span></div><span style="font-size:20px;"><div style="text-align:justify;"> Both involve: </div></span><p></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">one source</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">one mechanism</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">repeated exposure</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">continuing damage over time</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Thus, courts already accept the legal framework needed for golf-ball roof damage to be treated as one occurrence.<br></span></p></div>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><br></p></div></div></div><div data-element-id="elm_OQihnpINafXh1A9fPbsNgQ" data-element-type="iconHeadingText" class="zpelement zpelem-iconheadingtext "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpicon-container zpicon-align-center zpicon-align-mobile-center zpicon-align-tablet-center "><style></style><span class="zpicon zpicon-common zpicon-anchor zpicon-size-md zpicon-style-none "><svg width="896" height="896" viewBox="0 0 1792 1792" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M1472 992v480q0 26-19 45t-45 19h-384v-384h-256v384h-384q-26 0-45-19t-19-45v-480q0-1 .5-3t.5-3l575-474 575 474q1 2 1 6zm223-69l-62 74q-8 9-21 11h-3q-13 0-21-7l-692-577-692 577q-12 8-24 7-13-2-21-11l-62-74q-8-10-7-23.5t11-21.5l719-599q32-26 76-26t76 26l244 204v-195q0-14 9-23t23-9h192q14 0 23 9t9 23v408l219 182q10 8 11 21.5t-7 23.5z"/></svg></span><h4 class="zpicon-heading " data-editor="true"><span style="font-size:24px;"><strong>4. Distinguishing the Few Cases That Favor Multiple Occurrences</strong></span></h4><div class="zpicon-text-container " data-editor="true"><p style="text-align:justify;"><br></p><div><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Insurers often cite cases involving clearly separate causes. They are distinguishable.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Goose Creek Consol. ISD v. Continental Casualty Co.&nbsp;</span></strong><span style="font-size:20px;color:rgb(78, 83, 85);">658 S.W.2d 338, 340–41 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1983, no writ)</span></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Two fires at different locations = two occurrences.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">H.E. Butt Grocery</span></strong><span style="font-size:20px;"> (above)</span></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Each assault was its own cause, so multiple occurrences.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">U.E. Texas One-Barrington, Ltd. v. General Star Indem. Co.&nbsp;</span></strong><span style="font-size:20px;color:rgb(78, 83, 85);">332 F.3d 274, 276–78 (5th Cir. 2003)</span></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Separate plumbing leaks in different structures were separate occurrences.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Why These Are Not Like Golf-Ball Roof Damage</span></strong></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Different buildings</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Different causes</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Different times</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Different mechanisms</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Golf-ball roof cases involve:</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">one location</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">one hazard</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">one line of play</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">one mechanism of impact</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">one policy period</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Thus, the insurer’s “multiple occurrences” cases do not apply.<br></span></p></div>
</div></div></div><div data-element-id="elm_Up5pQrtINcQCkSwV0ZenrQ" data-element-type="iconHeadingText" class="zpelement zpelem-iconheadingtext "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpicon-container zpicon-align-center zpicon-align-mobile-center zpicon-align-tablet-center "><style></style><span class="zpicon zpicon-common zpicon-anchor zpicon-size-md zpicon-style-none "><svg width="896" height="896" viewBox="0 0 1792 1792" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M1472 992v480q0 26-19 45t-45 19h-384v-384h-256v384h-384q-26 0-45-19t-19-45v-480q0-1 .5-3t.5-3l575-474 575 474q1 2 1 6zm223-69l-62 74q-8 9-21 11h-3q-13 0-21-7l-692-577-692 577q-12 8-24 7-13-2-21-11l-62-74q-8-10-7-23.5t11-21.5l719-599q32-26 76-26t76 26l244 204v-195q0-14 9-23t23-9h192q14 0 23 9t9 23v408l219 182q10 8 11 21.5t-7 23.5z"/></svg></span><h4 class="zpicon-heading " data-editor="true"><span style="font-size:24px;"><strong>5. Applying Texas Law to Golf-Ball Roof Damage</strong></span></h4><div class="zpicon-text-container " data-editor="true"><p style="text-align:justify;"></p><div><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">The cause is the continuing hazard created by the golf course layout</span></strong><span style="font-size:20px;">, not each golfer's swing.</span></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">The ongoing condition is:</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">a tee box oriented toward your home</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">a fairway aligned in a way that sends mishits toward your roof</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">predictable flight paths creating ongoing exposure</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">This is exactly the type of repeated exposure Texas HO-3 policies group into <em>one</em> occurrence.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">The Homeowner’s Argument</span></strong></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ol><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">The policy defines occurrence to include “continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful conditions.”</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">My roof experienced repeated exposure to golf balls from the same hole.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Texas counts occurrences by cause, not by impact.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">The cause is one continuing hazard.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Therefore, all damage within the policy year is one covered loss subject to one deductible.</span></p></li></ol></div>
<div><h3><p></p></h3></div></div></div></div><div data-element-id="elm_GC_her9a_cNGcoYvLm_QhA" data-element-type="iconHeadingText" class="zpelement zpelem-iconheadingtext "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpicon-container zpicon-align-center zpicon-align-mobile-center zpicon-align-tablet-center "><style></style><span class="zpicon zpicon-common zpicon-anchor zpicon-size-md zpicon-style-none "><svg width="896" height="896" viewBox="0 0 1792 1792" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M1472 992v480q0 26-19 45t-45 19h-384v-384h-256v384h-384q-26 0-45-19t-19-45v-480q0-1 .5-3t.5-3l575-474 575 474q1 2 1 6zm223-69l-62 74q-8 9-21 11h-3q-13 0-21-7l-692-577-692 577q-12 8-24 7-13-2-21-11l-62-74q-8-10-7-23.5t11-21.5l719-599q32-26 76-26t76 26l244 204v-195q0-14 9-23t23-9h192q14 0 23 9t9 23v408l219 182q10 8 11 21.5t-7 23.5z"/></svg></span><h4 class="zpicon-heading " data-editor="true"><span style="font-size:24px;"><strong>6. Practical Steps One Might Use When Filing the Claim</strong></span></h4><div class="zpicon-text-container " data-editor="true"><div><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Document the Pattern</span></strong></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Photograph clusters of impacts.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Collect golf balls (logos help tie them to the course).</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Keep a log of when you hear/see impacts.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Note the consistent direction of flight.</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">File One Claim for the Policy Year</span></strong></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Tell the carrier:</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">you discovered cumulative damage</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">impacts came from one continuing hazard</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">policy language groups this exposure into a single occurrence</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Use an Expert</span></strong></h3><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Have a roofer or engineer confirm:</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">the impacts came from a consistent direction</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">impacts were caused by high-velocity projectiles</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">damage is consistent with repeated golf-ball strikes</span></p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:20px;"></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">the damage is functional, not merely cosmetic</span></p></li></ul></div>
<div><h3></h3></div></div></div></div><div data-element-id="elm_Vz88VBZknykBaqzJF6UpKA" data-element-type="iconHeadingText" class="zpelement zpelem-iconheadingtext "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpicon-container zpicon-align-center zpicon-align-mobile-center zpicon-align-tablet-center "><style></style><span class="zpicon zpicon-common zpicon-anchor zpicon-size-md zpicon-style-none "><svg width="896" height="896" viewBox="0 0 1792 1792" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M1472 992v480q0 26-19 45t-45 19h-384v-384h-256v384h-384q-26 0-45-19t-19-45v-480q0-1 .5-3t.5-3l575-474 575 474q1 2 1 6zm223-69l-62 74q-8 9-21 11h-3q-13 0-21-7l-692-577-692 577q-12 8-24 7-13-2-21-11l-62-74q-8-10-7-23.5t11-21.5l719-599q32-26 76-26t76 26l244 204v-195q0-14 9-23t23-9h192q14 0 23 9t9 23v408l219 182q10 8 11 21.5t-7 23.5z"/></svg></span><h4 class="zpicon-heading " data-editor="true"><strong><span style="font-size:24px;">7. Conclusion</span></strong></h4><div class="zpicon-text-container " data-editor="true"><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Under Texas law and Texas HO-3 policy language, repeated golf-ball strikes are very often one occurrence, not many. Texas courts focus on the cause, and a home repeatedly struck because of its position next to a golf hole is experiencing one continuous hazard.</span></p><p><span style="font-size:20px;"></span></p><div><span style="font-size:20px;"><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>For many homeowners, this means:</span></p><span></span><ul><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>one deductible</span></p><span></span></li><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>one claim</span></p><span></span></li><span></span><li><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>coverage for the full roof damage</span><span> discovered during the policy period</span></p><span></span></li><span></span></ul><span></span><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>If your insurance company is trying to classify each golf-ball strike as a separate deductible event, you may have strong grounds to challenge that decision.</span></p></span></div>
</div></div></div><div data-element-id="elm_RRWQreOrYEMaYzh5bXmNqQ" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left zptext-align-mobile-left zptext-align-tablet-left " data-editor="true"><p></p><div><h1 style="text-align:center;"></h1></div>
<p></p><div><h1 style="text-align:center;"><strong>Need Help With a Texas Homeowners Claim?</strong></h1><p><span style="font-size:24px;">If you’re dealing with repeated golf-ball damage—or any roof or property claim, my office can help you understand your rights, challenge improper deductible stacking, and force carriers to follow Texas law and the policy language they wrote.</span></p><span style="font-size:24px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:24px;">Schedule a consultation today.</span></strong></p></div>
</div></div><div data-element-id="elm_3pdf63ByRminvHFbIkUUXw" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-center zptext-align-mobile-center zptext-align-tablet-center " data-editor="true"><p></p><div><h3><br></h3></div>
<p></p></div></div><div data-element-id="elm_bIUx7PV9RumH9F0uXL9UZA" data-element-type="button" class="zpelement zpelem-button "><style></style><div class="zpbutton-container zpbutton-align-center zpbutton-align-mobile-center zpbutton-align-tablet-center"><style type="text/css"></style><a class="zpbutton-wrapper zpbutton zpbutton-type-primary zpbutton-size-md " href="javascript:;" target="_blank"><span class="zpbutton-content">Get Started Now</span></a></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 22:20:13 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wear and Tear in Insurance Claims: What Carriers Don’t Want You to Know]]></title><link>https://www.claimattorney.com/blogs/post/wear-and-tear-in-insurance-claims-what-carriers-don-t-want-you-to-know</link><description><![CDATA[HERE IS THE SECRET. INSURANCE POLICIES ARE WRITTEN BY ATTORNEYS AND IF THEY ARE AMBIGUOUS, IT IS LIKELY INTENTIONAL! What “Wear &amp; Tear” Really Mean ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zpcontent-container blogpost-container "><div data-element-id="elm_MzjjtIbESUmzzsz1fVu3dQ" data-element-type="section" class="zpsection "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpcontainer-fluid zpcontainer"><div data-element-id="elm_KKfpMmJyS2GZS018o89g-g" data-element-type="row" class="zprow zprow-container zpalign-items-flex-start zpjustify-content- " data-equal-column="false"><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_FB5gzP2GTYelZcBAB6mNZQ" data-element-type="column" class="zpelem-col zpcol-12 zpcol-md-12 zpcol-sm-12 zpalign-self- "><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_U-OXOu7u-pg3g5eOrzST-Q" data-element-type="image" class="zpelement zpelem-image "><style> @media (min-width: 992px) { [data-element-id="elm_U-OXOu7u-pg3g5eOrzST-Q"] .zpimage-container figure img { width: 1240px !important ; height: 347px !important ; } } </style><div data-caption-color="" data-size-tablet="" data-size-mobile="" data-align="center" data-tablet-image-separate="false" data-mobile-image-separate="false" class="zpimage-container zpimage-align-center zpimage-tablet-align-center zpimage-mobile-align-center zpimage-size-custom zpimage-tablet-fallback-fit zpimage-mobile-fallback-fit hb-lightbox " data-lightbox-options="
                type:fullscreen,
                theme:dark"><figure role="none" class="zpimage-data-ref"><span class="zpimage-anchor" role="link" tabindex="0" aria-label="Open Lightbox" style="cursor:pointer;"><picture><img class="zpimage zpimage-style-none zpimage-space-none " src="https://www.claimattorney.com/Picture1.png" size="custom" alt="Storm-damaged roof with missing shingles – insurance claim wear and tear example" data-lightbox="true"></picture></span></figure></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_uk2UGtdQIG3FqG16U4sB6Q" data-element-type="heading" class="zpelement zpelem-heading "><style></style><h2 class="zpheading zpheading-style-none zpheading-align-left zpheading-align-mobile-left zpheading-align-tablet-left " data-editor="true"><strong>📘 The Policyholder’s Playbook: Wear and Tear in Real Claims</strong></h2></div>
<div data-element-id="elm_IFZa9aQWbDUUu85UAuKcBA" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left zptext-align-mobile-left zptext-align-tablet-left " data-editor="true"><div style="line-height:1;"><div style="line-height:1.5;"><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:18px;font-weight:700;">HERE IS THE SECRET. INSURANCE POLICIES ARE WRITTEN BY ATTORNEYS AND IF THEY ARE AMBIGUOUS, IT IS LIKELY INTENTIONAL!</span></p><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><strong>What “Wear &amp; Tear” Really Means</strong></span></p><div><h3><span style="font-size:18px;"><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Insurance companies often deny claims by citing “wear and tear.” In plain English, that’s just the natural aging of your property. Think:</span></p><ul><li><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Paint fading over time</span></p></li><li><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Small cracks in walls from settling</span></p></li><li><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Roof shingles naturally losing granules</span></p></li></ul><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Most policies exclude normal wear and tear. That’s fair enough — insurance isn’t meant to be a maintenance contract.</span></p><p style="text-align:justify;">But here’s the catch: policies do cover sudden and accidental damage. If a storm rips shingles off, hail strikes your roof, or a pipe bursts, that’s new damage — <strong>even if your property is old.</strong></p><span><hr style="text-align:justify;"></span></span></h3><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><strong>How Insurers Misuse the Exclusion</strong></span></h3><h3><span style="font-size:18px;"><p style="text-align:justify;line-height:1.5;"><span>In practice, insurance companies often stretch the “wear and tear” excuse to deny valid claims. They’ll look for any way to blame a problem on age, maintenance, or neglect.</span></p><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>From my own experience handling claims, I’ve seen:</span></p><ul><li><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Creased shingles blamed on “high nailing”</span><span> instead of wind damage.</span></p></li><li><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Obvious storm creasing written off as “vandalism” or “wear and tear.”</span></p></li><li><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Broken windows blamed on anything but the actual storm</span><span> — I’ve heard excuses ranging from thermal stress to “pre-existing weakness.”</span></p></li></ul><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="text-decoration-line:underline;">The reality: these denials aren’t always honest assessments. They’re tactics to save the carrier money.</span></p><span><hr style="text-align:justify;"></span></span></h3><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><strong>What Denial Letters Look Like</strong></span></h3><h3><span style="font-size:18px;"><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>Most homeowners and business owners don’t know how to read a denial letter. Carriers use coded phrases like:</span></p><ul><li style="text-align:justify;"><span>“Long-term seepage”</span></li><li style="text-align:justify;">"Normal wear and tear"</li><li style="text-align:justify;">“Marring, deterioration, or defect”</li><li style="text-align:justify;">“No evidence of a storm-created opening”</li><li>"Long term seepage"</li><li>"No storm created opening"</li></ul><p style="text-align:justify;"><span>These are red flags. They signal the insurer is leaning on exclusions instead of acknowledging new, covered damage. Seek a professionally immediately.</span></p><span><hr style="text-align:justify;"></span></span></h3><h3 style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><strong>Real-World Examples</strong></span></h3><h3 style="font-weight:bold;">1. <strong>Cheetham v. Southern Oak Ins. Co. (2013)</strong></h3><h3><span style="font-size:18px;"><div><span style="font-size:18px;"><div><ul><li><p><strong style="font-weight:bold;">What happened:</strong> The Cheethams’ home suffered water damage after a deteriorated pipe broke. The insurer denied coverage, pointing to the wear-and-tear and water damage exclusions.</p></li><li><p><strong style="font-weight:bold;">Court’s view:</strong> The appellate court said exclusions are interpreted strictly against insurers. It found the policy ambiguous and ruled that because the damage came from the home’s own plumbing system, the loss was covered</p><p>Cheetham v. Southern Oak Ins.</p></li><li><p><strong style="font-weight:bold;">Takeaway for homeowners:</strong> Even if damage starts with “deterioration” (wear and tear), if it causes an accidental water discharge, coverage may still exist. Don’t accept “pipe was old” as the final word.</p></li></ul><hr style="font-weight:bold;"></div></span></div></span></h3><h3 style="font-weight:bold;">2. <strong>Dodge v. People’s Trust Ins. Co. (2021)</strong></h3><h3><span style="font-size:18px;"><div><span style="font-size:18px;"><div><ul><li><p><strong style="font-weight:bold;">What happened:</strong> The Dodges’ cast iron pipes corroded, causing water damage. The insurer said corrosion = “act of nature” and capped coverage at $10,000 under a water damage endorsement.</p></li><li><p><strong style="font-weight:bold;">Court’s view:</strong> The appellate court agreed — rust and corrosion were considered natural processes (an “act of nature”), so the $10,000 sub-limit applied</p><p>Dodge v. People's Trust Ins.</p></li><li><p><strong style="font-weight:bold;">Takeaway for homeowners:</strong> Corrosion and long-term deterioration are often limited by sub-limits, even if sudden water damage occurs. Watch out for endorsements that quietly cap your payout.</p></li></ul><hr style="font-weight:bold;"></div></span></div></span></h3><h3 style="font-weight:bold;">3. <strong>Sebo v. American Home Assurance Co. (2016)</strong></h3><h3><span style="font-size:18px;"><div><span style="font-size:18px;"><div><ul><li><p><strong style="font-weight:bold;">What happened:</strong> Sebo’s $8 million Naples home was destroyed by a mix of defective construction, rain, and Hurricane Wilma. The insurer denied coverage, saying defective construction (excluded) caused much of the loss.</p></li><li><p><strong style="font-weight:bold;">Court’s view:</strong> The Florida Supreme Court applied the Concurrent Cause Doctrine (CCD). When multiple causes (some excluded, some covered) combine, coverage applies if at least one covered peril contributed — unless the policy clearly says otherwise</p><p>Sebo v. Am. Home Assur. Co.</p></li><li><p><strong style="font-weight:bold;">Takeaway for homeowners:</strong> If storm damage and wear and tear both play a role, you may still be covered. Insurers can’t automatically deny just because wear and tear was involved.</p></li></ul></div></span></div></span></h3><h3></h3><h3 style="text-align:justify;line-height:1.5;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><strong>Steps Policyholders Should Take</strong></span></h3><h3 style="text-align:justify;line-height:1.2;"><p><span style="font-size:18px;">1. Document Everything – Take photos, videos, and keep repair/maintenance records.</span></p><p><span style="font-size:18px;">2. Get a Second Opinion – Hire a contractor, public adjuster, or attorney to inspect.</span></p><p><span style="font-size:18px;">3. Request the Denial in Writing – Force the carrier to spell out their reasons.</span></p><p><span style="font-size:18px;">4. Challenge the Denial – Many claims denied under “wear and tear” are later overturned.</span></p><p><span style="font-size:18px;">5. Remember Burden of Proof</span><span style="font-size:18px;"> – Once you show a loss occurred, it’s the insurer’s job to prove an exclusion applies.</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;">Document Everything</span><span style="font-size:18px;"> – Take photos, videos, and keep repair/maintenance records.</span></h3><h3 style="text-align:justify;line-height:1.2;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Get a Second Opinion</span><span style="font-size:18px;"> – Hire a contractor, public adjuster, or attorney to inspect.</span></h3><h3 style="text-align:justify;line-height:1.2;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Request the Denial in Writing</span><span style="font-size:18px;"> – Force the carrier to spell out their reasons.</span></h3><h3 style="text-align:justify;line-height:1.2;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Challenge the Denial</span><span style="font-size:18px;"> – Many claims denied under “wear and tear” are later overturned.</span></h3><h3><span style="font-size:18px;"><div></div></span></h3><h3><span style="font-size:18px;"><div></div></span></h3><h3><span style="font-size:18px;"><div></div></span></h3><h3><span style="font-size:18px;"><div></div></span></h3><h3><span style="font-size:18px;"><div></div></span></h3><h3 style="text-align:justify;line-height:1.5;"><span style="font-size:18px;">👉 Bottom line: Don’t just take the carrier’s word for it. If they say “wear and tear,” you may still have a valid, covered claim.</span></h3></div>
</div></div></div></div><div data-element-id="elm_cqGGHujUSNSd7XL-AkxrmQ" data-element-type="heading" class="zpelement zpelem-heading "><style></style><h2 class="zpheading zpheading-style-none zpheading-align-left zpheading-align-mobile-left zpheading-align-tablet-left " data-editor="true"><span><span><strong><span>⚖️ Legal Corner: Lessons on Wear and Tear</span></strong></span><span><strong><br></strong></span></span></h2></div>
<div data-element-id="elm_vAvzNOyudJTUjQQp_cV3bA" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left zptext-align-mobile-left zptext-align-tablet-left " data-editor="true"><p><br></p></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_h4ktzKmgjBbSeM1PPxdYUQ" data-element-type="button" class="zpelement zpelem-button "><style></style><div class="zpbutton-container zpbutton-align-center zpbutton-align-mobile-center zpbutton-align-tablet-center"><style type="text/css"></style><a class="zpbutton-wrapper zpbutton zpbutton-type-primary zpbutton-size-md zpbutton-style-none " href="javascript:;"><span class="zpbutton-content">GET YOUR FREE CLAIM REVIEW</span></a></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_0OXPgWruGzgdMIR3wMlH8g" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left zptext-align-mobile-left zptext-align-tablet-left " data-editor="true"><p></p><p style="text-align:center;"><strong><span style="font-size:24px;">⚖️Legal Corner</span></strong></p><div><h3><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Cheetham v. Southern Oak Ins. Co., 114 So. 3d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)</span></strong></h3><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Facts:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> The insureds’ home suffered water damage when a deteriorated pipe burst. The insurer denied coverage, citing wear-and-tear and water damage exclusions.</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Issue:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> Does the wear-and-tear exclusion bar coverage for water damage from a burst pipe?</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Holding:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> The court found the exclusions ambiguous and ruled the policy covered the loss.</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Reasoning:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> Exclusions are strictly construed against the insurer; ambiguities favor the policyholder.</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Takeaway:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> Even if a pipe is old, a sudden break causing water damage may still be covered.</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:18px;"><hr></span><h3><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Dodge v. People’s Trust Ins. Co., 321 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)</span></strong></h3><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Facts:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> Corroded cast iron pipes caused water damage. The insurer applied a $10,000 sub-limit under a Water Damage Endorsement, arguing corrosion was an “act of nature.”</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Issue:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> Does corrosion-related water damage fall under the endorsement’s sub-limit?</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Holding:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> The court upheld the sub-limit. Corrosion was deemed a natural process and therefore subject to the endorsement.</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Reasoning:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> Clear policy language limited the payout; courts enforce unambiguous sub-limits.</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Takeaway:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> Corrosion and wear-and-tear losses may be limited by hidden policy endorsements.</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></ul><span style="font-size:18px;"><hr></span><h3><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Sebo v. Am. Home Assur. Co., 208 So. 3d 694 (Fla. 2016)</span></strong></h3><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><ul><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Facts:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> A luxury home suffered damage from defective construction, rain, and Hurricane Wilma. The insurer denied coverage, pointing to the construction defect exclusion.</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Issue:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> When both covered and excluded causes contribute to a loss, does coverage exist?</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Holding:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> The Florida Supreme Court applied the <strong>Concurrent Cause Doctrine (CCD):</strong> coverage exists if a covered peril contributes, unless the policy clearly avoids CCD.</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Reasoning:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> Many losses have multiple causes. Without clear anti-concurrent cause language, insurers cannot escape coverage.</span></p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><li><span style="font-size:18px;"></span><p><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">Takeaway:</span></strong><span style="font-size:18px;"> Even if wear and tear contributed, coverage may still apply when a storm or other covered peril also caused the damage.</span></p></li></ul></div>
</div></div><div data-element-id="elm_avC-FQclbizhCVZkU1s2FQ" data-element-type="heading" class="zpelement zpelem-heading "><style></style><h2 class="zpheading zpheading-style-none zpheading-align-left zpheading-align-mobile-left zpheading-align-tablet-left " data-editor="true"><span>👉 Final Takeaway</span></h2></div>
<div data-element-id="elm_8Hn4IXHIotCINhF7rTG_-g" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left zptext-align-mobile-left zptext-align-tablet-left " data-editor="true"><p></p><div><p>Carriers often misuse “wear and tear” to avoid paying. But Florida law shows:</p><ul><li><p>Burst pipes may still be covered.</p></li><li><p>Corrosion may be capped, but only if endorsements clearly limit it.</p></li><li><p>Mixed causes (wear + storm) may still result in coverage under CCD.</p></li></ul><p><strong>If your claim was denied for “wear and tear,” contact The Claim Attorney today for a free claim review.</strong></p></div>
<p></p></div></div><div data-element-id="elm_YBwS2VHt1IyF6uwRbYURlQ" data-element-type="button" class="zpelement zpelem-button "><style></style><div class="zpbutton-container zpbutton-align-center zpbutton-align-mobile-center zpbutton-align-tablet-center"><style type="text/css"></style><a class="zpbutton-wrapper zpbutton zpbutton-type-primary zpbutton-size-md zpbutton-style-none " href="javascript:;"><span class="zpbutton-content">FREE CLAIM REVIEW</span></a></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 21:09:09 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Estimating Permit Costs in Florida: Best Practices for Contractors, Adjusters, and Attorneys]]></title><link>https://www.claimattorney.com/blogs/post/wear-and-tear-in-insurance-claims-what-carriers-don-t-want-you-to-know1</link><description><![CDATA[Estimating building permit fees accurately is crucial for Florida construction projects. Contractors, insurance adjusters, and construction attorneys ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zpcontent-container blogpost-container "><div data-element-id="elm_sMCtyXXJT9iXhjocZ77GDw" data-element-type="section" class="zpsection "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpcontainer-fluid zpcontainer"><div data-element-id="elm_6jU0jNT2TB6H4rBJBLioXw" data-element-type="row" class="zprow zprow-container zpalign-items- zpjustify-content- " data-equal-column=""><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_KPG2HIflRfacr1AZ3Yfo9w" data-element-type="column" class="zpelem-col zpcol-12 zpcol-md-12 zpcol-sm-12 zpalign-self- "><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_aH617kBIeacu1wmNydWyKA" data-element-type="imagetext" class="zpelement zpelem-imagetext "><style> @media (min-width: 992px) { [data-element-id="elm_aH617kBIeacu1wmNydWyKA"] .zpimagetext-container figure img { width: 412px !important ; height: 233px !important ; } } </style><div data-size-tablet="" data-size-mobile="" data-align="left" data-tablet-image-separate="false" data-mobile-image-separate="false" class="zpimagetext-container zpimage-with-text-container zpimage-align-left zpimage-tablet-align-center zpimage-mobile-align-center zpimage-size-custom zpimage-tablet-fallback-fit zpimage-mobile-fallback-fit hb-lightbox " data-lightbox-options="
            type:fullscreen,
            theme:dark"><figure role="none" class="zpimage-data-ref"><span class="zpimage-anchor" role="link" tabindex="0" aria-label="Open Lightbox" style="cursor:pointer;"><picture><img class="zpimage zpimage-style-none zpimage-space-none " src="https://www.claimattorney.com/1755015595072.png" size="custom" data-lightbox="true"></picture></span></figure><div class="zpimage-text zpimage-text-align-left zpimage-text-align-mobile-left zpimage-text-align-tablet-left " data-editor="true"><p></p><p><span style="font-size:18px;">Estimating building permit fees accurately is crucial for Florida construction projects. Contractors, insurance adjusters, and construction attorneys often need to budget permit costs for bids or claims. However, permit fee structures vary widely across Florida jurisdictions, and underestimating these fees can lead to surprises[1]. This article provides an impartial, informative guide to what permit costs include, how fees differ for new construction vs. remodels, common estimating mistakes, and tips to avoid underestimating permit fees in Florida. Real examples (from 2024 fee schedules in Tampa, Wellington, Orange City, Brevard County, etc.) are included to illustrate typical costs.</span></p></div>
</div></div><div data-element-id="elm_KNtvXgzoS04J3f7xFUYLoQ" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left zptext-align-mobile-left zptext-align-tablet-left " data-editor="true"><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-weight:600;font-size:18px;">What Do 'Permit Costs' Include?</span></p><p><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></p><div style="line-height:1.2;"><p style="margin-bottom:32px;line-height:1.5;"><span style="font-size:18px;">When we talk about&nbsp;<em>permit costs</em>, we mean all the fees associated with obtaining building permits for a project. In Florida, permit costs typically consist of several components:</span></p><ul><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Building Permit Fee:</span> The core fee for the building permit itself, usually based on the project’s construction value or size. This covers the government’s cost to review plans and inspect the construction. Each city/county sets its own formula or rate (e.g. a percentage of project value or a rate per $1,000 of value)[2].</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Plan Review Fee:</span> Many jurisdictions charge a separate fee for reviewing plans. Often this is calculated as a percentage of the building permit fee (commonly 50% in many Florida cities[3]) or a rate per value. For example, Wellington, FL requires the plan review fee to be 50% of the building permit fee (minimum<span style="font-weight:600;"> $75)[4]</span>. This fee is usually paid at application and covers the initial plan-check process.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Trade Permit Fees:</span> In addition to the main building permit, individual trade permits may be needed for electrical, plumbing, mechanical, gas, or fire systems (unless the jurisdiction’s fee structure “bundles” these into one). Each trade permit can carry its own fee. <em>Example:</em> In some Florida cities, a new single-family home might require separate plumbing, electric, and HVAC permits – often with base fees around $85–$135 each[5]. If these trade fees aren’t included in your estimate, the total permit cost will be too low.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">State Surcharges:</span> Florida law mandates a surcharge on building permits to fund building code enforcement and training. All permits statewide incur a 2.5% surcharge (combined, on the permit fee) – 1.5% for the Building Code Administrators and Inspectors Fund and 1% for the Building Code Education Fund[6]X. This is usually a small amount (minimum $4), but it must be added to every permit cost.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Impact and Mobility Fees:</span> For new construction (and certain additions), counties and cities often assess impact fees (or similar mobility fees) to fund infrastructure like roads, parks, schools, and fire services. These are one-time fees collected with the permit or before the Certificate of Occupancy[7]. Impact fees <em>do not apply</em> to simple interior remodels, but for a new building they can be substantial – often thousands of dollars. For example, a new 2,500 sq. ft. home in Orlando would incur roughly $7,000 in transportation impact fees, $2,500 for sewer, $11,000+ for school impact, plus park fees[8] – easily $15k–$20k extra on top of the permit. Always determine if impact or mobility fees apply to your project’s location and scope.</span></li></ul><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-weight:600;font-size:18px;">Permit Fee Structures Vary by Florida Jurisdiction</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Florida has over 400 municipalities and 67 counties, each with its own permit fee schedule. There is no single statewide rate – you must check the local schedule. Here are a few examples of how permit fee structures differ in various Florida jurisdictions:</span></p><ul><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">City of Tampa:</span> Tampa’s Construction Services Division uses a comprehensive fee schedule that includes all trades (building, fire, electrical, plumbing, gas, mechanical) in one combined permit fee for a new building[9]. Fees are primarily based on project value. <em>For instance, Tampa’s schedule (2025) indicates a base permit fee of $50 for the first $1,000 of project value, plus about $5 for each additional $1,000 in value</em> (roughly 0.5% of construction value)[10]. Tampa also adds the mandatory 2.5% state surcharge on the permit fee[11]. (Impact fees for transportation, schools, water/sewer connections, etc., are assessed separately by the county or city – Tampa provides links to these on its site[12].) Tampa even offers an online Permit Fee Estimator tool to help calculate fees for common project types[13].</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Village of Wellington:</span> Wellington uses a tiered formula based on construction value. The building permit fee starts at a $150 minimum for projects up to $7,500, then 2.0% of value from $7,500 to $100k, 1.75% from $100k to $500k, 1.5% from $500k to $1.5M, and 1.25% beyond that[14]. This valuation includes all construction components (structural, electrical, plumbing, etc.)[15]. <em>Plan review is charged at 50% of the permit fee</em> (minimum $75)[16]. On top of that, Wellington applies the state surcharges of 1% + 1.5% on the permit fee[17].</span></li></ul><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Example: A $100,000 addition in Wellington would have a permit fee about $2,000, plus ~$1,000 plan review and $75 in state fees – roughly $3,075 total in permit-related fees (about 3% of value).</span></p><ul><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Orange City:</span> Orange City’s fee schedule shows different rates for new construction vs. remodels. For one- and two-family homes, the building permit fee for a new dwelling is $4.50 per $1,000 of value (0.45%) with a $75 minimum [18]. For residential remodels or additions, the rate is higher: $6.40 per $1,000 (0.64%)[19] – likely because smaller remodel projects still require administrative effort. Plan review in Orange City is relatively low, e.g. $0.50 per $1,000 of value for residential (min $50)[20]. Commercial projects have their own rates (around $6–$7.50 per $1,000 for permits, and $1.75 per $1,000 for plan review)[21]. Orange City also charges the Florida surcharges (listed as 1.5% + 1.5% of permit fee, per their 2022 document)[22]. <em>This means Orange City’s fees, as a percentage, can be quite modest.</em> For example, a $50,000 home remodel would incur about <span style="font-weight:600;">$320 for the permit</span> and $50 for plan review (plus ~$8 state surcharge) – only around $378 total (under 1% of the project) by the city’s formula.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Brevard County:</span> Brevard County uses a base fee + value model and also lists various departmental review fees. For a commercial or residential building permit, Brevard’s schedule (2025) shows an application processing fee $25, plus a Building Code fee of $100 for the first $1,000 of job value, and $5.25 per $1,000 thereafter[23]. (This works out to roughly 0.525% of construction value, with a $100 minimum.) On top of that, the state surcharge 1.5% + 1% is applied to the “Building Code” fee total[24]. Brevard also itemizes <em>other reviews</em>: e.g. Zoning review $210, Concurrency review $175, Fire review fee $52 + 0.34% of job value[25], and utility or environmental reviews if applicable[26]. Impact fees in Brevard are collected separately before final inspection (and depend on the project type)[27]. Example: For a new commercial build valued at $300,000 in unincorporated Brevard, one might estimate ~$1,668 in building permit fees, ~$42 in state surcharge, ~$1,072 in fire review, $210 zoning, $175 concurrency, etc., totaling around $3,200 (excluding impact fees) for permits and reviews. A simpler residential remodel in Brevard (say $50k value) would pay roughly a few hundred dollars in permit fees.</span></li></ul><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">As you can see, permit costs can differ drastically: some cities charge a higher percentage of value but include most items in one fee, while others have lower rates but add multiple smaller fees. Always refer to the specific city or county’s latest fee schedule for accurate numbers. Below is a comparison table of estimated permit fees in four Florida jurisdictions:</span></p><div><figure style="margin-bottom:32px;"><div style="margin-bottom:16px;"><div><img src="https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/v2/D4E12AQFo0l8ASseDFg/article-inline_image-shrink_1000_1488/B4EZifCxswHoAQ-/0/1755014962637?e=1760572800&amp;v=beta&amp;t=36ILmGT-HRSbFQmuHVYtQeWmod9V9AC2AXKaFUeb7S0" alt="Article content" style="width:925.28px !important;height:594px !important;max-width:100% !important;"></div>
</div><figcaption style="width:632px;text-align:center;"></figcaption></figure></div>
<p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-weight:600;font-size:18px;">New Construction vs. Remodeling: Key Differences in Fees</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-size:18px;font-weight:600;">Permit costs for new construction are usually higher than for remodels</span><span style="font-size:18px;">, both in absolute dollars and often as a percentage of project cost. Several factors explain this:</span></p><ul><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Impact Fees:</span> As noted, impact fees are typically required for new buildings (e.g. new houses, new commercial structures) to offset the “impact” on public infrastructure. Remodels that don’t add square footage or dwelling units generally do not trigger impact fees[36]. This alone means new construction often carries thousands more in fees. For instance, building a new home in a Florida county could incur 4–5% of the total project cost in impact fees, whereas a renovation project would pay $0 in impact fees[37].</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Building Permit Calculations:</span> Some jurisdictions charge different rates for new builds vs. alterations. In the Orange City example, the city charges $4.50 per $1k for new residential construction but $6.40 per $1k for remodels[38]. However, because a new build’s value is usually much larger, the total permit fee will still be higher for new construction. Many places (like Tampa, Wellington, Brevard) use the <em>same</em> formula for any building permit based on value – but the new build will simply have a higher value to calculate against. Moreover, any minimum fees per permit (for trades, etc.) will stack up more for a new build (since you need all new systems) whereas a small interior job might only pull one or two permits.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Additional Reviews:</span> New constructions often involve more plan reviews and inspections – e.g. initial site plan, infrastructure, fire safety, environmental or concurrency reviews – sometimes each with their own fee. Remodels, especially interior-only ones, can bypass many of these. For example, a new building in Brevard had fees for fire, zoning, concurrency, etc., in our example, whereas a straightforward remodel might only pay the base building permit and perhaps a zoning review if changing footprint[39].</span></li></ul><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Percentage of project cost:</span>Taking all the above into account, <span style="font-weight:600;">remodel/renovation permit fees typically run around 1–3% of the construction value</span>, whereas<span style="font-weight:600;">new home construction permit+impact fees often run 4–5% (or more) of the total project cost</span>in Florida. In one homeowner’s case, a builder initially underestimated permit and impact fees on a new house by $4,500 – highlighting how significant these costs can be[40]. As a general rule:</span></p><ul><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">A <span style="font-weight:600;">minor interior remodel</span> (no added area) might see permit costs closer to 1% of its value (especially for larger-value remodels in jurisdictions with low rates[41]). Smaller jobs could be a higher percentage due to minimum fees, but still usually within a few percent.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">A <span style="font-weight:600;">major addition or renovation</span> (adding square footage) may incur 2–3% in permit fees. If the addition creates new dwelling units or significant impact (e.g. converting a garage to living space in some areas), there could be additional fees (like impact fee for an added dwelling unit or increased utility load).</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">New single-family homes</span> commonly see total permit-related costs in the range of ~4–5% of the construction budget in Florida[42]. This includes building permit, plan checks, trades, state fees, <em>and</em> typical impact fees. High-impact fee locales can push this higher (5%+), whereas areas with minimal impact fees (or fee reductions) might be a bit lower.</span></li></ul><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-weight:600;font-size:18px;">Common Estimating Errors to Avoid</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Even experienced professionals can miss some of the permit costs if they’re not careful. Here are<span style="font-weight:600;">common errors</span>in estimating permit fees – and how to avoid them:</span></p><ul><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Omitting Trade Permit Fees:</span> Don’t assume the main building permit covers everything. Many Florida jurisdictions require separate permits for electrical, plumbing, mechanical, gas, roofing, etc. For a new house, it’s not unusual to have 4–6 permits. Always include the fees for each required trade permit. These might be flat fees (e.g. Orange City’s minimum $75 per trade[43] or Indian Harbour Beach’s ~$85 base for single-family plumbing/electric[44]) or value based. Solution: Check if the city’s fee schedule bundles trades or not. If not, add each one’s cost. When in doubt, call the building department to clarify which separate permits (and fees) will apply to your scope.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Misjudging Plan Review Fees:</span> A very common mistake is forgetting that a plan review fee is due or underestimating it. As noted, many areas charge plan review at 50% of the permit fee[45]. If you only budgeted for the permit itself, you’ll be off by a significant margin. Other cities might charge plan check by the hour or a small per-square-foot fee, but there will likely be <em>something</em>. Solution: Always double-check the plan review policy. If it’s a percentage, calculate it. If it’s hourly, consider the complexity of your project (e.g. a commercial project might incur multiple discipline reviews). Budget conservatively for plan review – it’s better to overestimate slightly than to miss it entirely.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Ignoring the State Surcharge:</span> It’s only a couple of percent, but it’s required by law on every permit. For instance, Tampa’s website prominently reminds users of the 2.5% Florida Building Permit Surcharge on all permits[46]. If your permit fees are large (say a $20,000 permit fee on a big project), this surcharge can be an extra $500. <span style="font-weight:600;">Solution:</span> Always tack on that 2.5% at the end of your fee calculation. (Note: some fee calculators or schedules show fees <em>before</em> surcharge and then add it, so ensure your final number includes it.)</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Forgetting Impact Fees (for New Construction):</span> This is a big one in new development budgets and insurance replacement cost claims. Impact fees might be handled by a different department or at the end of the project, so they can be “out of sight, out of mind” during initial budgeting. Don’t let that happen. For example, Hillsborough County notes that mobility/impact fees are assessed prior to permit issuance for new development[47] – if you didn’t account for them, your project will be short on funds to pick up the permit. Solution: Research the impact fees for the project type and size <em>early</em>. Most counties publish impact fee schedules (often based on unit count, square footage, or bedrooms for residences). Include a line item for these in any estimate for a new building. Remember that even large remodels that increase square footage significantly <em>could</em> incur a partial impact fee (for added traffic, etc., depending on local rules).</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Using Outdated Fee Schedules:</span> Florida municipalities update their fee schedules, typically annually or biannually. Estimating based on an old schedule can lead to error. For example, if a city raises its permit rate from say $5 per $1k to $6 per $1k, that’s a 20% hike. Solution: Always obtain the current fee schedule (2024 or latest) from the city’s official website. The sources cited in this article (Tampa, Wellington, Orange City, etc.) are recent as of 2024–2025. When preparing an estimate or a claim, double-check if any fee changes have occurred. If in doubt, call the building department to confirm current rates.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Not Tailoring Estimates to the Project Type:</span> Ensure you’re applying the correct fee formula for your project. For instance, some locales have <em>different fee tables for residential vs. commercial, or new vs. alteration</em>. If you mistakenly use the residential rate for a commercial project, your number could be off. <span style="font-weight:600;">Solution:</span> Read the fine print in fee schedules – identify which category your project falls into. If a project has mixed components (e.g. a new addition plus interior remodel of an existing space), there may be multiple permits or blended calculations.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Overlooking Miscellaneous Fees:</span> These might include minor fees that can add up: such as zoning plan approval fees, tree removal permit (if clearing a lot), driveway/ROW permit fees, or utility connection fees (if pulling new water meter, etc.). While not “building permit” fees per se, they often coincide with the building permit process. For example, a new build might require a $100 address assignment fee (Brevard County example[48]), or a county might charge a drainage review fee. Solution: Review the entire application checklist. If the permit application references additional reviews or permits (right-of-way, utility, fire marshal, environmental), include something for those fees as well.</span></li></ul><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">By being aware of these pitfalls, you can greatly improve the accuracy of permit cost estimates.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-weight:600;font-size:18px;">Tips to Avoid Underestimating Permit Fees</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">To wrap up, here is a summary of<span style="font-weight:600;">best practices</span>and tips for contractors, adjusters, and attorneys when dealing with permit cost estimation:</span></p><ul><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Start with Official Data:</span> Always base your estimate on the official fee schedule or calculator of the jurisdiction. Most Florida cities/counties publish their fee schedules online, and some (like Tampa) have fee estimator tools[49]. Bookmark the relevant websites for quick reference.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">List All Required Fees:</span> Use a checklist of potential fees: building permit, plan review, each trade permit, state surcharge, impact fees, and any special local fees (fire, utility, etc.). Go through this list for every project to ensure nothing is missed. It helps to create a template. <em>For example:</em> “Building permit = $__ (per formula), Plan review = $__ (x% of permit), Electrical permit = $<span style="font-weight:600;">, </span>Plumbing = $, Mechanical = $, State surcharge = $, Impact fees = $, Other = $.”</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Differentiate New Construction and Remodels:</span> Recognize when a project will trigger <em>extra fees</em>. New constructions, additions, or change-of-use projects will have more fees (impact fees, site reviews) than an interior renovation. <span style="font-weight:600;">Allocate a higher percentage or lump sum for permits on new builds (around 5% of build cost as a rule of thumb, unless you have precise local figures)[50]. For remodels, 1–3% is often sufficient[51] – but again use local specifics when available.</span></span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Verify with the Building Department:</span> When in doubt, don’t hesitate to call the local building department’s permitting office. They can often confirm the major fees if you provide project details. This is especially useful for unique projects that don’t fit neatly into published tables. Some jurisdictions even allow you to submit preliminary permit info to get a fee quote.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Consider Hiring a Permit Runner or Consultant:</span> For complex projects or if you’re an adjuster not familiar with a particular locale, a permit expeditor or consultant can help identify all required permits and fees. Their insight can prevent costly omissions. They might also be aware of local nuances (e.g. <em>“City X charges a flat $Y fire inspection fee for commercial permits”</em>).</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Account for Fee Reductions or Exemptions:</span> In some cases, you might be eligible for reduced fees – for instance, Florida law requires jurisdictions to reduce permit fees if you use a private provider for code inspections or plan review[52] (since you’re taking some workload off the building department). Also, rebuilding after storm damage might qualify for waived fees in certain emergency ordinances. These situations are not common, but if they apply, they can lower costs. Just be cautious and get official confirmation before assuming any discounts.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Document Fees for Insurance Claims:</span> If you are an adjuster or attorney dealing with an insurance claim, make sure to itemize the permit fees as part of the reconstruction cost. Florida law generally allows recovery of reasonable permit fees in property damage claims. Cite the city’s schedule or invoice as proof. This will help avoid disputes about whether the permit cost is justified. It’s also a good practice for contractors to show permit costs as a separate line in bids, so owners understand this is a real, necessary expense backed by local fee schedules.</span></li><li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><span style="font-weight:600;">Allow a Contingency:</span> Finally, it’s wise to include a small contingency for permit fees in your budget (especially if dealing with preliminary estimates long before pulling the permit). <span style="font-weight:600;">A 10–15% contingency on the calculated fees can cover any unforeseen extra minor permits or slight changes in valuation that increase the fee. Any unused portion is a bonus, but if something was overlooked, you have a buffer to cover it.</span></span></li></ul><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">By following these best practices, you can confidently estimate permit costs and avoid the common pitfalls that lead to underestimation. In summary, do your homework on local fees, include all the components, and double-check your work. Accurate permit cost estimates will ensure your project budgets and insurance claims are on target, preventing surprises down the line.</span></p></div>
</div></div><div data-element-id="elm_QZUFppS42qwhO75PNBY-Yg" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style> [data-element-id="elm_QZUFppS42qwhO75PNBY-Yg"].zpelem-text { line-height:1.5px; } [data-element-id="elm_QZUFppS42qwhO75PNBY-Yg"].zpelem-text :is(h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6){ line-height:1.5px; } </style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left zptext-align-mobile-left zptext-align-tablet-left " data-editor="true"><p style="margin-bottom:32px;"><em><strong><span style="font-size:24px;">Sources:</span></strong></em></p><p></p><div><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">Official 2024 fee schedules and guides from&nbsp;</p></div>
<blockquote style="margin-left:40px;border:none;"><p></p><div><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">City of<a target="_self" href="http://tampatampa.govtampa.gov/">Tampatampa.govtampa.gov</a>,</p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">Village of<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonwellingtonfl.govwellingtonfl.gov/">Wellingtonwellingtonfl.govwellingtonfl.gov</a>,&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">City of&nbsp; Orange<a target="_self" href="http://cityorangecityfl.govorangecityfl.gov/">Cityorangecityfl.govorangecityfl.gov</a>,&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">Brevard<a target="_self" href="http://countybrevardfl.govbrevardfl.gov/">Countybrevardfl.govbrevardfl.gov</a>;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">Florida Statutes (Sections 553.721 &amp; 468.631) via local<a target="_self" href="http://citestampa.gov/">citestampa.gov</a>;&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">Hillsborough County and Orlando impact fee<a target="_self" href="http://documentshcfl.govetminc.com/">documentshcfl.govetminc.com</a>; and&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">various Florida permitting resources.</p></div>
<p></p></blockquote><div><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">These examples reflect the diversity of permit fee structures and the importance of referencing current, official data when estimating.</p><hr style="margin-bottom:32px;width:584px;"><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[1]<a target="_self" href="http://houzz.com/">houzz.com</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[2]<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonfl.govorangecityfl.gov/">wellingtonfl.govorangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[3]<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonfl.gov/">wellingtonfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[4]<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonfl.gov/">wellingtonfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[5]<a target="_self" href="http://indianharbourbeach.org/">indianharbourbeach.org</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[6]<a target="_self" href="http://indianharbourbeach.org/">indianharbourbeach.org</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[7]<a target="_self" href="http://hcfl.govhcfl.gov/">hcfl.govhcfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[8]<a target="_self" href="http://etminc.cometminc.com/">etminc.cometminc.com</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[9]<a target="_self" href="http://tampa.gov/">tampa.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[10]<a target="_self" href="http://suncoastpermits.com/">suncoastpermits.com</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[11]<a target="_self" href="http://tampa.gov/">tampa.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[12]<a target="_self" href="http://tampa.gov/">tampa.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[13]<a target="_self" href="http://tampa.gov/">tampa.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[14]<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonfl.gov/">wellingtonfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[15]<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonfl.govwellingtonfl.gov/">wellingtonfl.govwellingtonfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[16]<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonfl.gov/">wellingtonfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[17]<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonfl.gov/">wellingtonfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[18]<a target="_self" href="http://orangecityfl.gov/">orangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[19]<a target="_self" href="http://orangecityfl.gov/">orangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[20]<a target="_self" href="http://orangecityfl.gov/">orangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[21]<a target="_self" href="http://orangecityfl.gov/">orangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[22]<a target="_self" href="http://orangecityfl.gov/">orangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[23]<a target="_self" href="http://brevardfl.govbrevardfl.gov/">brevardfl.govbrevardfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[24]<a target="_self" href="http://brevardfl.gov/">brevardfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[25]<a target="_self" href="http://brevardfl.gov/">brevardfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[26]<a target="_self" href="http://brevardfl.gov/">brevardfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[27]<a target="_self" href="http://brevardfl.gov/">brevardfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[28]<a target="_self" href="http://tampa.gov/">tampa.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[29]<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonfl.govwellingtonfl.gov/">wellingtonfl.govwellingtonfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[30]<a target="_self" href="http://orangecityfl.govorangecityfl.gov/">orangecityfl.govorangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[31]<a target="_self" href="http://brevardfl.govbrevardfl.gov/">brevardfl.govbrevardfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[32]<a target="_self" href="http://suncoastpermits.comtampa.gov/">suncoastpermits.comtampa.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[33]<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonfl.govwellingtonfl.gov/">wellingtonfl.govwellingtonfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[34]<a target="_self" href="http://orangecityfl.govorangecityfl.gov/">orangecityfl.govorangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[35]<a target="_self" href="http://brevardfl.govbrevardfl.gov/">brevardfl.govbrevardfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[36]<a target="_self" href="http://hcfl.gov/">hcfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[37]<a target="_self" href="http://etminc.cometminc.com/">etminc.cometminc.com</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[38]<a target="_self" href="http://orangecityfl.gov/">orangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[39]<a target="_self" href="http://brevardfl.gov/">brevardfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[40]<a target="_self" href="http://houzz.com/">houzz.com</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[41]<a target="_self" href="http://orangecityfl.gov/">orangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[42]<a target="_self" href="http://jamesmadison.org/">jamesmadison.org</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[43]<a target="_self" href="http://orangecityfl.gov/">orangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[44]<a target="_self" href="http://indianharbourbeach.org/">indianharbourbeach.org</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[45]<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonfl.gov/">wellingtonfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[46]<a target="_self" href="http://tampa.gov/">tampa.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[47]<a target="_self" href="http://hcfl.gov/">hcfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[48]<a target="_self" href="http://brevardfl.gov/">brevardfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[49]<a target="_self" href="http://tampa.gov/">tampa.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[50]<a target="_self" href="http://jamesmadison.org/">jamesmadison.org</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[51]<a target="_self" href="http://wellingtonfl.govorangecityfl.gov/">wellingtonfl.govorangecityfl.gov</a></p><p style="margin-bottom:32px;">[52]<a target="_self" href="http://strategiceng.us/">strategiceng.us</a></p></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 21:09:09 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>